|
A
monitor is suspended above observer's head. The observer sees
the screen in the mirror, mounted in front of his face. The
image on the screen is reflected such that the depicted objects
seem to sit under the mirror, where observer's hand is. PHOTO:
Ken Huie, 2003.
|
Inter-sensory
Integration
Inter-sensory
integration combines information across sensory systems, or across
sub-modalities of sensory systems. I study the integration of vision
and touch. The two senses obtain information using different physical
processes and thus have different strengths and weaknesses. Does
the brain take advantage of these differences when information from
vision and touch is available at the same time?
In a
visual-haptic
virtual environment we measure how precisely human observers
perform simple perceptual tasks with each sense alone, and with
both senses together. Then we compare how the single-sense estimates
are combined by humans and by a statistically optimal ideal
observer.
In the
tasks that we tested so far we find that human observers approach
statistical optimality, so that their combined percepts are more
precise than is possible with either sense alone.
|
|
Observer's
thumb and index finger are inserted into the thimbles of two force-feedback
devices (PHANToMs) which
are located under
the mirror. PHOTO: Ken Huie, 2003.
|
To achieve
that, the nervous system relies more on the sense that provides more precise
information, but the less precise senses are taken into account too. The
weights assigned to each sense are close to those prescribed by the principle
of maximal likelihood. Some of our results are summarized here:
- Gepshtein,
S. & Banks, M. S. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and
touch combine in size perception. Current Biology 13 (6) p. 483-488.
[PDF] [Supplementary
Materials]
- Levitan,
C. A., Gepshtein, S. & Banks, M. S. (under review). Visual and haptic
perception of curved surfaces. [Preliminary results of this study are
available in this
poster.]
|